Asymmetry in Grammar, Volume 2: Morphology, Phonology, by Anna Maria Di Sciullo

By Anna Maria Di Sciullo

This quantity provides proof that asymmetry, as a estate of linguistic family members, is salient in grammar. The papers in morphology convey additional proof for the centrality of asymmetry in word-structure. it really is proven that asymmetry is a part of the inner constitution of practical constructs reminiscent of determiners and complementizers, because it is the case for lexical constructs. additional proof is gifted for the asymmetry of prefixes in verb constitution. A typology of formal items according to the excellence among maximal and minimum different types is formulated. it's proposed that Formal Complexity drives the switch from man made to analytic expressions. The papers in phonology element to the truth that asymmetry is a part of that linguistic measurement when it comes to strategies that gets rid of symmetric kin, when it comes to head-dependency kin, when it comes to relative scope of the specific gains in any stock, by way of common ideas together with definite language particular offerings. additionally, the papers on acquisition carry to fore experimental information that time to an analogous path. The asymmetry of grammatical kinfolk offers the shape of the preliminary nation of language that allows the kid to deal with the poverty of the stimulus.

Show description

Read or Download Asymmetry in Grammar, Volume 2: Morphology, Phonology, Acquisition PDF

Best grammar books

Universal Grammar and language learnability

Anjum P. Saleemi argues that the purchase of language as a cognitive process can safely be understood via pairing the formal method of studying, known as learnability conception, with Chomsky's idea of common Grammar and its declare that human language is innately limited, with a few predefined area for edition.

Set Sail! 3 - Vocabulary and Grammar Practice

ELT: studying fabric & coursework

The Evolution of Negation TILSM 235

Why do languages swap? The concept that the grammar of negation evolves in accordance with cycles is checked out from the behaviour of unfavourable goods and structures, more often than not throughout the background of English and French. The reports express that the difference inside of a language at any given aspect of background is just too nice for cycles to be invoked as an self sufficient mechanism of grammar swap.

Additional info for Asymmetry in Grammar, Volume 2: Morphology, Phonology, Acquisition

Example text

In A. M. ), Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics. , Obenhauer, H. et al. (1998). From Wh-questions to Wh-interrogatives: the internal structure of Wh-phrases and the left periphery. Evidence from Portuguese, French and Hungarian. Article posted at Chomsky Celebration. Internet. Bach, E. (1996). On the grammar of complex words. In Configurations. Essays on Structure and Interpretation. A. M. ), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Borer, H. (1991). The causative-inchoative alternation.

Questi ‘these’. This correctly predicts that the temporal adjunct may not modify a non-propositional operator, as can be seen by comparing the examples in (56) above with the examples in (59). (59) a. *Gianni è uscito prima-questo Paulo sia entrato. ’ b. *Gianni è uscito dopo-questa Paulo è entrato. ’ c. *Gianni è uscito poi-questi loro è entrato. ’ d. ’ Temporal and rationale adjuncts identify the conceptual pseudo-space according to which the +/–wh receives an interpretation. The asymmetry of adjuncts with respect to the M-shell is expected in Asymmetry Theory and is not identical to the syntactic asymmetry of adjunct wh-phrases.

The Shell includes a conjunction-operator (Op) sister-containing a variable (x) and a restrictor structure where the specifier and the complement of R are propositions (t1 and t2 ). The temporal adverb (TI) is an adjunct to the M-Shell, as depicted below.   Anna Maria Di Sciullo (57) (58) x ti P x –wh P x Op x ti F R –wh R x –wh x Op R t1 x R –wh te R t1 R t2 The –wh connective expresses a temporal relation between two propositions, where t2 occurs in a subsequent, precedent or identical point in time than t1 .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.17 of 5 – based on 32 votes